35mm vs 50mm Lens

I'm writing this because I could never find anything relevant on this topic. Every time I searched for it I ended up with 35mm film related results or the never ending lens reviews. 

I started out shooting a 50mm on a Nikon digital body and really liked it.  

With a 50mm you can produce nice bokeh and exclude stuff not needed from your frame. Isolate your subject as they call it. They are cheap and versatile. Very nice indeed.  

 

yoshika_50mm.jpg

 

I now have a 35mm on my Leica film body but recently have not been happy with my results. 

I've been thinking to get a fifty again since I know it'll yield more 'keepers'. But are they really keepers? 

Yes, I can simplify what's in my frame. Tighter crops, less stuff in the frame, bokeh the hell out of any background distraction. It DOES work indeed.  

But every shot I take of my lovely wife will look the same. Whether I take it in India, in Tokyo or Germany. It'll be beautiful and simple BUT it'll all be the same.  

When I look back at my shots in a couple of years I want to know the story behind it, too.  

yoshika_avocado_restaurant.jpg

For me at least the 35mm focal length is where it's at.  

Yes it's not easy. But, if it was easy it would be boring.